Services/Application Security
Application Security Services

Application security services that fix issues before release

Secure code review, threat modeling, design reviews and scanner triage from offensive security engineers. Every finding comes with a code reference or proof of concept and a fix your developers can ship.

  • Manual secure code review, guided by SAST
  • Threat modeling and design reviews before you build
  • SAST, DAST and SCA results triaged, false positives removed
  • Mapped to OWASP ASVS and the OWASP Top 10
The credentials behind every engagement
CREST-accredited for penetration testingISO/IEC 27001 certifiedSOC 2 Type 2 attested
2026 CyberSecurity Breakthrough Awards winnerG2 High Performer, Fall 2026
Penetration Testing Solution of the Year2026 CyberSecurity Breakthrough Awards

Reviewed by Omair Manzoor, Founder & CEO, ioSENTRIX · Updated

Trusted by security teams at
See it in action

A pentest is a snapshot. Your risk isn't.

One release, two ways: a single pentest before go-live, or ioSENTRIX Continuous Security: AppSec as a Service plus CTEM, powered by PTaaS.

Swipe to see the full timeline →

Late findings delay launch

Flaws stay open until the pentest finds them all at once, and the fixes push go-live back.

Then nothing until the next test

New exposures after launch stay open until the next pentest comes around.

Build it right, then keep proving it

AppSec as a Service fixes flaws where they start. CTEM, powered by PTaaS, finds and validates new exposures all year.

Read this exhibit as text
  1. The same release is built two ways: with one pentest before go-live, and with ioSENTRIX Continuous Security.
  2. With one pentest, four flaws (an authorization gap, SQL injection, a vulnerable library and an unprotected API) stay open until the pentest finds them together. Fixing and retesting them pushes go-live past the planned date.
  3. After that launch, a new CVE in a library and an exposed admin panel stay untested until the next pentest. Two findings are still open at the end.
  4. With Continuous Security, AppSec as a Service catches each flaw in the stage where it starts: threat modeling, code review, dependency review and tuned scans. A PTaaS pentest on change confirms the release, and go-live happens on time.
  5. After launch, CTEM, powered by PTaaS (monthly DAST, a pentest quarterly or on each major change, and an annual deep test), finds and validates the same new exposures. No findings are left open.

Source: ioSENTRIX Continuous Security methodology. Findings are illustrative examples, not client data.

The short answer

What are application security services?

Application security services find and fix security weaknesses in software before and after it ships. They include secure code review, threat modeling, design reviews, and static, dynamic and dependency testing (SAST, DAST and SCA), with findings explained in the code your developers already work in.

A penetration test shows what an attacker can do to a running application. Application security work starts earlier: it reviews designs and code, so issues are fixed while they are still easy to change. Secure code review services pair tools with manual review, because scanners miss business logic and authorization flaws.

At ioSENTRIX, application security work is done by hand by certified engineers at a CREST-accredited firm, with findings mapped to OWASP ASVS 5.0 and the NIST SSDF (SP 800-218).

You need application security services if

  • You are designing a new product or a major feature
  • Scanners produce more findings than your team can triage
  • A customer or auditor asked for secure code review evidence
  • You have no in-house AppSec engineer, or need more of them
What we do

Four ways we secure your software

Scope follows how you build. Most engagements combine two or more of these.

Design

Threat modeling & design review

Find design flaws before anyone writes code.

  • Data flow diagrams & trust boundaries
  • STRIDE-based threat identification
  • Authentication & authorization design
  • Cloud & third-party integration risks
Code

Secure code review

Manual review of the code that matters most, guided by SAST.

  • Authentication, session & access control
  • Injection & input handling
  • Cryptography & secrets
  • Business logic flaws
Tools

SAST, DAST & SCA

Scanner results your developers can trust.

  • Tool setup & tuning in CI/CD
  • False positive removal
  • Dependency & SBOM review
  • Priority based on exploitability
Program

Secure SDLC & enablement

Make security part of how you build.

  • Security requirements & secure SDLC
  • Security champions support
  • Secure coding training
  • Maturity review against OWASP SAMM
Methodology

How we test: example review cases

A sample of the checks in a typical application security engagement. Your scope decides the full list.

TM-01

Trust boundary review

We map where data crosses trust boundaries, such as browser to API or service to service, and check each crossing for authentication and validation.

SCR-01

Authorization on every route

We trace each API route and handler to confirm it checks the caller's permissions, not only that they are signed in.

SCR-02

Injection paths

We follow user input from entry point to database, shell, template and file system calls, looking for places it is not handled safely.

SCR-03

Secrets and cryptography

We look for hardcoded keys, weak algorithms, home-grown crypto and tokens that never expire.

SCA-01

Reachable vulnerable dependencies

We check whether vulnerable library functions are actually called by your code, so upgrades are ranked by real exposure.

VAL-01

Scanner finding validation

We reproduce SAST and DAST findings by hand, remove false positives and confirm which issues are exploitable.

Sample finding

What a finding looks like in our report

An illustrative example in our report format. Not client data.

Finding 01 · IllustrativeHigh

Invoice export endpoint checks login but not ownership

OWASP Top 10: Broken Access Control · CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

What we found

Code review showed the invoice export handler loaded records by the ID in the request and only checked that the caller had a valid session. The SAST tool did not flag it, because nothing in the code looked unsafe on its own. Changing the ID in the request returned another customer's invoice.

Impact

Any customer can download every other customer's invoices.

How to fix it

Load records through a query scoped to the caller's account, and add a shared authorization check to every handler that takes an object ID. Add a test that requests another account's object and expects a denial.

What you get

What you get from every AppSec engagement

Not a scanner export. Reviewed findings and fixes your developers can act on.

1

Findings with code references, ranked by exploitability

Each finding points to the file and line, explains how it could be exploited and gives remediation guidance for your language and framework.

2

Threat models you keep

Design reviews produce data flow diagrams, threats and agreed mitigations your team can update as the product changes.

3

Walkthrough, then re-review

The engineer who found each issue walks your developers through it, and re-review is available once fixes land.

ioSENTRIX sample penetration test report cover

See how we write findings before you talk to us

A redacted sample penetration test report (web application): finding write-ups, proof-of-concept evidence and remediation. No form required.

Download the sample report (PDF) →
Verified reviews

What security leaders say about working with us

★★★★★
“Unlike other providers, Omair and his team truly dive deep into our infrastructure, delivering findings that go well beyond the surface level. Communication is direct and seamless.”
Jesus B.
Cybersecurity Manager, Banking
Verified G2 review ↗
★★★★★
“We were impressed with ioSENTRIX’s ability to independently validate the security of our customer-facing product.”
Zeehasham R.
Data Scientist, Security Operations · Fortune 500 insurer
Verified Clutch review ↗
★★★★★
“The team at ioSENTRIX is professional and highly skilled at their craft.”
Awwab A.
SVP, Chief Information Security Officer
Verified G2 review ↗
How it works

How an application security engagement works

Four steps, so you know what happens and what you get.

01

Scope

We agree the applications, repositories, designs and tools in scope, and what you need to prove at the end.

Start
02

Review and testing

Engineers model threats, review code and triage scanner results, starting with the riskiest parts of the application.

Most of the engagement
03

Report

Each finding has a severity, a code reference or proof of concept and remediation guidance.

At close
04

Fix support

We walk your developers through the findings and re-review fixes once they land.

After fixes
Reply in under an hour → scoping call → fixed quote in writing → review, by scope → report, walkthrough and re-review
How we compare

Not a scanner license. Not a pentest after the code ships.

What application security services cover compared with the usual alternatives.

ioSENTRIX application security
SAST / DAST tool alone
Annual pentest alone
When issues are found
In design, in code and before release
On every scan
After release
Business logic & authorization
Reviewed by hand in the code
Rarely detected
Tested in the running app
False positives
Removed before you see them
Left for your team to triage
Few
Fix guidance
File, line and a fix for your framework
Generic rule text
Remediation guidance per finding
Standards
OWASP ASVS, OWASP Top 10, CWE
Varies by tool
OWASP Top 10, PTES
Scope and price

What affects the scope and price of AppSec work

Application security engagements are priced on effort. These are the decisions that move the quote.

What moves the quote

  1. 01Lines of code, languages and frameworks in scope
  2. 02How many applications, services and repositories
  3. 03Whether threat modeling and design reviews are included
  4. 04Whether we use your SAST, DAST and SCA tools or bring our own
  5. 05A one-off review, or ongoing support for each release
  6. 06Re-review windows and the evidence your customers expect
Read: One-Off AppSec Services: Flexible & Targeted Security Solutions →

What we need from you to start

  • Read access to the repositories in scope
  • Architecture or design documents, even rough ones
  • Existing scanner results, if you have them
  • A developer contact for questions during the review
Scope my AppSec review
Track record

Numbers you can check

Ratings you can verify on G2 and Clutch.

G2
4.9 / 5
on G2 from 12 verified reviews
Clutch
5.0 / 5
on Clutch, Premier Verified
CREST-accredited for penetration testing
2017
founded; CREST-accredited, ISO 27001 certified, SOC 2 Type 2 attested
Independently verified

Credentials held by the firm

Every engagement runs inside a company whose methods and own security are checked by outside bodies.

CREST-accredited for penetration testing

CREST-accredited for penetration testing

CREST assesses the firm's testing methodology, quality assurance and handling of client data.

View our CREST listing →
SOC 2 Type 2 attested

SOC 2 Type 2 attested

An independent auditor tested our own security controls over time.

Request the SOC 2 report →
ISO/IEC 27001 certified

ISO/IEC 27001 certified

Our information security management system is certified to ISO/IEC 27001.

View in our trust center →
2026 CyberSecurity Breakthrough Awards winnerG2 High Performer, Fall 2026

Recognized independently

Penetration Testing Solution of the Year, 2026 CyberSecurity Breakthrough Awards. G2 High Performer, Fall 2026.

Founded in 2017.

Our commitments

What you can count on

Four promises we make on every testing engagement.

  • Free retest of every fixOnce your team fixes a finding, we test it again at no extra cost and update the report.
  • A fixed priceThe quote you sign is what you pay. The price only changes if you change the scope.
  • A report your auditor acceptsIf your auditor has questions about the report, we answer them and update it until it is accepted.
  • A reply in under an hourSend the form and we reply within an hour during US business hours.
For your buying team

Everything your reviewers will ask for

Security, finance and procurement each need something different. Forward this page, or pull what each reviewer needs.

For security

Sample report

See exactly what you get: findings, proof of concept, fixes and retest results.

Download the sample report (PDF) →
For vendor risk

Trust center

Our SOC 2 Type 2 report and security documentation for your vendor review.

Open the trust center →
For procurement

Procurement pack

Master services agreement, sample statement of work, certificate of insurance and W-9.

Request the procurement pack →
For your team

Share this page

Send the link to the people who need to sign off.

Who you work with

Who does the work

Senior security engineers do the hands-on work and write up the results, so the person who found an issue explains it to your team.

Certified engineers

Each engineer holds one or more of OSCP, OSWE, OSCE, CISSP, CISA or AWS security certifications.

Accredited firm

ioSENTRIX is CREST-accredited for penetration testing, ISO/IEC 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type 2 attested.

Since 2017

Founded in 2017, with security work for Fortune 100, financial services, insurance and SaaS companies.

Ready to find the flaws your scanners miss?

We reply in under an hour · no sales pitch

Scope my AppSec review
Standards

Frameworks we test and map to

◆OWASP ASVS 5.0◆OWASP Top 10◆OWASP SAMM v2◆NIST SSDF (SP 800-218)◆CWE◆STRIDE
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is secure code review?

Secure code review is a close reading of source code for security weaknesses, such as missing authorization checks, injection and unsafe cryptography. We use SAST tools for breadth and manual review for the logic and access control issues tools miss.

What is threat modeling?

Threat modeling is a structured way to find what could go wrong in a design before it is built. We map data flows and trust boundaries, identify threats with methods such as STRIDE, and agree mitigations with your team. Read more on threat modeling in AppSec.

What is the difference between SAST and DAST?

SAST (static application security testing) analyzes source code without running it. DAST (dynamic application security testing) attacks a running application from the outside. Each finds issues the other misses, so we use both and confirm results by hand.

Do you offer ongoing application security, not just one-off reviews?

Yes. One-off reviews suit a single release or audit. For coverage of every release, see application security as a service.

How long does a secure code review take?

Most reviews run days to weeks, depending on code size, languages and how much threat modeling is included. We reply in under an hour during US business hours, and the scope, timeline and fixed quote follow the scoping call.

Ready when you are

Fix security issues before they ship

Tell us what you are building and how your team ships. We will scope the right review and send a fixed quote based on effort.

We reply in under an hour · Fixed quote in writing before work starts · Your details are never shared